STATE AUDIT FILE

Worker classification,
state by state.

A state unemployment agency does not use the federal IRS common-law test. Each state publishes its own worker-status framework — an ABC test, a 20-factor review, a common-law factor list, or a two-part control-and-independent-business test — and reads it against its own statute. Start with the audit process, then open the guide for the state that sent the notice.

01

EVERY STATE

The audit process

These steps apply regardless of which state test governs: what starts an audit, how to organize the record request, how to answer a classification questionnaire, and what happens if contractors are reclassified.

02

26 STATES

By state

Each guide names the exact test the state agency applies and turns it into an evidence file rather than a scorecard. Alphabetical.

ALAlaskaAlaska UI Contract Labor: The ABC Test Plus the $50 / 24-Day Rule Employers Commonly Miss7 MIN →ARArizonaArizona UI Worker Classification: Right to Control and the “Regular Part of the Business” Signal6 MIN →CACaliforniaCalifornia EDD Worker-Classification Audit: Build the File Around California Law12 MIN →COColoradoColorado UI Worker Classification: How the Two-Part Test, Contract Presumption, and Advisory Opinion Fit Together7 MIN →COConnecticutConnecticut UI ABC Test: The B-Prong Has Two Paths—Document the One You Actually Use7 MIN →FLFloridaFlorida Reemployment Tax Classification: How to Prepare for the RTS-6061 Ten-Factor Review16 MIN →GEGeorgiaGeorgia Unemployment Tax Classification: The Unusual SS-8 Alternative in the GDOL Employer Handbook16 MIN →ILIllinoisIllinois Unemployment Insurance Section 212: A Three-Prong Test With No Room for a Missing Prong16 MIN →MAMarylandMaryland Workplace Fraud Act: The Contractor File Construction and Landscaping Businesses Must Keep6 MIN →MAMassachusettsMassachusetts Independent Contractor Test: Why “Outside the Usual Course” Deserves Its Own File15 MIN →MIMichiganMichigan UIA Contractor Classification: Reconcile the 20-Factor Review Before an Audit or Claim16 MIN →MIMinnesotaMinnesota Worker Classification in 2026: Separate the General UI Review From Construction and Trucking Rules7 MIN →MIMissouriMissouri UI Worker Classification: Use the 20 Factors as Evidence—Then Check Statutory Employee and Exempt Categories7 MIN →NENebraskaNebraska Construction and Delivery Classification: Contractor Registration Is Not the Same as Employee Status7 MIN →NENevadaNevada UI ABC Test: Why an IRS Contractor Result or Written Agreement Does Not Settle State Coverage7 MIN →NENew JerseyNew Jersey ABC Test in 2026: What Employers Should Document Before the October 1 Regulations Become Operative16 MIN →NENew YorkNew York Unemployment Insurance Worker Classification: Focus on Supervision, Direction, and Control12 MIN →NONorth CarolinaNorth Carolina UI Contractor Status: Build the File Around Control or Direction, Not the 10996 MIN →OHOhioOhio UI Worker Classification: Choose the Right Test Before You Answer—General, Construction, or Trucking7 MIN →OROregonOregon ORS 670.600: Build the Contractor File Around the 3-of-5 Independent-Business Test16 MIN →PEPennsylvaniaPennsylvania UC Worker Classification: The Two-Part Test and the Records UCTS Expects to See16 MIN →TETexasTexas Workforce Commission Contractor Test: Review the Actual Direction and Control12 MIN →UTUtahUtah UI Independent Contractor Test: Prove Both an Independent Business and Freedom From Control7 MIN →VIVirginiaVirginia VEC Contractor Classification: Turn the 20 Factors Into an Evidence File, Not a Scorecard16 MIN →WAWashingtonWashington Unemployment Tax Contractor Test: The Two RCW 50.04.140 Paths Employers Should Not Blend16 MIN →WIWisconsinWisconsin UI Contractor Test: Freedom From Control Is Only Part One—Then You Need Six of Nine Conditions6 MIN →

Working a federal question instead? See the Form SS-8 and federal relief & corrections guides, or the full guide library.

Worker Classification Desk is an employer-education resource and does not provide legal or tax advice.